Re: pgsql: Add support for OAUTHBEARER SASL mechanism

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 6:12 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
> > On 1 Apr 2025, at 15:03, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > With the libpq-oauth split, this makes even more sense because
> > building a library that always throws an error isn't very useful.
> > (Don't build that file at all if the feature doesn't work.)
>
> After the split, configure/meson should fail if the libcurl dependency isn't
> satisfied or if the platform isn't supported.

Yeah, after sleeping on it I agree. If I want a "canary" buildfarm
animal to opt into compilation on unsupported platforms, I can instead
look into a manual #define or something; it doesn't have to be a
supported configure-time thing.

> > Since oauth/curl have some security implications, would it make more
> > sense to call the switch --enable-oauth (-Doauth) so users could
> > control better what features their libpq is going to have? Perhaps
> > some other feature (pg_service as URL?) is going to need libcurl as
> > well, but it should be configurable separately.
>
> Perhaps --with-oauth-client for the opt-in libpq-oauth?

It started as -Doauth way back when, but was changed as part of the
discussion at [1]. Peter, do you have any objections to switching back
to an OAuth-related name?

--Jacob

[1] https://postgr.es/m/6bde5f56-9e7a-4148-b81c-eb6532cb3651%40eisentraut.org