| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-09 12:50:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+nQapg91WVfb06uL02UEisPBejQd4sOC3G77aKqsnE7KQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 1:14 AM Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
> One design goal could be reproducible builds-alike, that is, have
> libpq configured with or without libcurl be completely identical, and
> the feature being present is simply the libpq-oauth.so file existing
> or not. That might make using plain dlopen() more attractive.
I think that's more or less what the current v3 does, but Jelte's
point (which is upthread for me but downthread for others :D) is that
making them identical might not actually be a desirable thing in this
situation, because if you don't compile --with-libcurl, when you test
that the feature is disabled you might potentially find that it is
not.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 1:39 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> How about ifdef-ing away the dlopen call if --with-libcurl is not specified.
This sounds like a pretty decent, simple way to go. Christoph, does
that ring any alarm bells from your perspective?
Thanks,
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2025-04-09 13:01:49 | Possible api miuse bms_next_member |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2025-04-09 12:44:04 | Re: Partition pruning on parameters grouped into an array does not prune properly |