| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-08 16:50:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+mn_xhkQEyS5KG3zoSOrvskVx8mhD8x_Z+0LL9PaZo1gQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:32 AM Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> wrote:
> And that should also not be a problem for distributions - they could offer a libpq and a libpq_oauth package, where only one of them can be installed at the same time, I guess? *
My outsider understanding is that maintaining this sort of thing
becomes a major headache, because of combinatorics. You don't really
want to ship a libpq and libpq-with-gss and libpq-with-oauth and
libpq-with-oauth-and-gss and ...
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2025-04-08 16:52:45 | Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-04-08 16:50:01 | Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects |