Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: 2025-01-21 00:43:41
Message-ID: CAOYmi+mVKAmOh2+G0KRypmkz3cXWP1X3g8YtuA0ZxOuZdfCgTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 4:40 PM Jacob Champion
<jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> But I can add a comment to the assignment to try to explain. I don't
> know what the likelihood of landing code that trips that assertion is,
> but an explicit assignment would at least stop problems from
> cascading.

On second thought, I can just fail the connection if this happens.

--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Schneider 2025-01-21 01:06:29 Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2025-01-21 00:40:36 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER