From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
Date: | 2025-04-15 19:45:28 |
Message-ID: | CAOYmi+mOKQZOaTjwAJ+BCuLRuwW=pv_zKKpqsjudJ+dxQBrCHg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:21 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I also don't mind being wrong, of course. But I think it's better to
> bet on making this like other things and then change strategy if that
> doesn't work out, rather than starting out by making this different
> from other things.
Works for me. (And it's less work, too!)
Thanks,
--Jacob
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-04-15 19:51:14 | Re: not null constraints, again |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-04-15 19:44:48 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |