| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-08 17:00:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+m7W-2XajSiNAXo6BVnLyU64Shidx0wPb4F==x1YRAppQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:49 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 09:43:01AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > By adding the new .so to a different package. For example, RPM specs
> > would just let you say "hey, this .so I just built doesn't go into the
> > main client package, it goes into an add-on that depends on the client
> > package." It's the same way separate client and server packages get
> > generated from the same single build of Postgres.
>
> Do we have any idea how many packagers are interested in doing this?
I'm not sure how to answer this. The primary drivers from the dev side
are you and Tom, I think. Christoph seems to be on board with a split
as long as we don't make his life harder. Wolfgang appears to be a
packager who would not make use of a split (and in fact cannot).
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2025-04-08 17:02:11 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Previous Message | Wolfgang Walther | 2025-04-08 16:57:18 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |