From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules |
Date: | 2024-04-25 16:16:16 |
Message-ID: | CAOYmi+kfsRfopQRTuJwpsO50Urq=-gwYDJ1fWNkDr3oYM1wdjA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:20 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>
> Attached patch tries to fix and clarify those.
s/negotiatied/negotiated/ in the attached patch, but other than that
this seems like a definite improvement. Thanks!
> (Note that the client will only attempt GSSAPI encryption if it can find
> kerberos credentials in the environment.)
Right. I don't like that it still happens with
sslnegotiation=requiredirect, but I suspect that this is not the
thread to complain about it in. Maybe I can propose a
sslnegotiation=forcedirect or something for 18, to complement a
postgresqls:// scheme.
That leaves the ALPACA handshake correction, I think. (Peter had some
questions on the original thread [1] that I've tried to answer.) And
the overall consensus, or lack thereof, on whether or not
`requiredirect` should be considered a security feature.
Thanks,
--Jacob
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e782e9f4-a0cd-49f5-800b-5e32a1b29183%40eisentraut.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-04-25 16:16:33 | Re: Add notes to pg_combinebackup docs |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-04-25 15:48:05 | Re: some additional (small) problems with pg_combinebackup and tablespaces |