Re: Log connection establishment timings

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, andrey(dot)chudnovskiy(at)microsoft(dot)com, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: Log connection establishment timings
Date: 2025-03-07 22:39:21
Message-ID: CAOYmi+kPzZie0ACS=g97iibCX35tv_VVvn7YAs7Ot0kj3k+D3w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 2:17 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yea, "auth_id" is too ambiguous for a GUC option. I went with
> "authorization" because it sounds a bit less like a stage while also
> being a recognizable word. It achieves symmetry -- though it doesn't
> match the prefix used in the logs.

Yeah, that sounds reasonable.

--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2025-03-07 22:47:45 Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2025-03-07 22:31:12 Re: Add Pipelining support in psql