From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules |
Date: | 2024-05-13 16:45:27 |
Message-ID: | CAOYmi+kPCxEr62+dGGUOEbzJc4qOfNAPc_v+=3yc0gzTZyEdCw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(There's, uh, a lot to respond to above and I'm trying to figure out
how best to type up all of it.)
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 9:13 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> However,
> I disagree with Jacob's assertion that sslmode=require has no security
> benefits over sslmode=prefer.
For the record, I didn't say that... You mean Jelte's quote up above?:
> sslmode=prefer and sslmode=require
> are the same amount of insecure imho (i.e. extremely insecure).
I agree that requiring passive security is tangibly better than
allowing fallback to plaintext. I think Jelte's point might be better
stated as, =prefer and =require give the same amount of protection
against active attack (none).
--Jacob
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-05-13 16:45:40 | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints |
Previous Message | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker | 2024-05-13 16:35:42 | Re: Allowing additional commas between columns, and at the end of the SELECT clause |