Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date: 2024-04-10 13:10:56
Message-ID: CAOYmi+=xdaHW6E6v5PnbSt8Pm_p3=graVmWFjZZ54w7fhaydWQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 12:31 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> * src/backend/libpq/be-secure-openssl.c
>
> +#include <openssl/bn.h>
>
> This patch doesn't appear to add anything, so why does it need a new
> include?

This one was mine -- it was an indirect header dependency that was
effectively removed in 1.1.0 and later, due to the bump to
OPENSSL_API_COMPAT [1]. We have to depend on it directly now.

--Jacob

[1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/b372b1f764/include/openssl/dh.h#L20-L22

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-04-10 13:19:15 Re: Table AM Interface Enhancements
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2024-04-10 12:44:10 Re: [PoC/RFC] Multiple passwords, interval expirations