Re: PG_TEST_EXTRA and meson

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: PG_TEST_EXTRA and meson
Date: 2024-08-23 16:25:12
Message-ID: CAOYmi+=jx=MWP2KjhjvM4viw2p3yPmsHMCQAXa6YwD29SBhRiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 5:59 AM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If I run
> export PG_TEST_EXTRA=xid_wraparound; ./configure --prefix=$BuildDir
> --enable-tap-tests && make -j4 && make -j4 install; unset
> PG_TEST_EXTRA
> followed by
> make -C $XID_MODULE_DIR check where
> XID_MODULE_DIR=src/test/modules/xid_wraparound - it skips the tests.

Right.

> I thought this was working before.

No, that goes back to my note in [1] -- as of c3382a3c3cc, the
variable was exported at only the src/test level, and I wanted to get
input on that so we could decide on the next approach if needed.

> Anyway, now I have written a script to test all the scenarios. You may
> want to test your patch using the script. It just needs PGDir to set
> to root directory of code.

Thanks! I see failures in 110, 120, and 130, as expected. Note that
constructions like

PG_TEST_EXTRA="" cd $XID_MODULE_DIR && make check && cd $PGDir

will not override the environment variable for the make invocation,
just for the `cd`. Also, rather than

export PG_TEST_EXTRA; ./configure ...; unset PG_TEST_EXTRA

it's probably easier to just pass PG_TEST_EXTRA=<setting> as a command
line option to configure.

> If there's some other way to setting PG_TEST_EXTRA when running
> configure, I think it needs to be documented.

./configure --help shows the new variable, with the same wording as
Meson. Or do you mean that it's significant enough to deserve a spot
in installation.sgml?

--Jacob

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOYmi%2B%3D8HVgxANzFT_BZrAeDPxAgA5_kbHy-4VowdbGr0chHvQ%40mail.gmail.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2024-08-23 16:38:36 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-08-23 15:59:17 Re: Eager aggregation, take 3