| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof? |
| Date: | 2024-08-01 20:51:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+=_VU9MLd_BknwuEEoPBVwDRByPCAc0dW+S9XFFe7vACw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 7:26 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Are you proposing that we invent two levels of leakproofness
> with different guarantees? That seems like a mess, not least
> because there are going to be varying opinions about where we
> should set the bar for the lower level.
It kind of reminds me of the kernel's "paranoia level" tunables, which
seem to proliferate in weird ways [1] and not make for a particularly
great UX.
--Jacob
[1] https://askubuntu.com/questions/1400874/what-does-perf-paranoia-level-four-do
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-08-01 20:53:31 | Re: Pluggable cumulative statistics |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2024-08-01 20:45:00 | Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof? |