Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Date: 2024-05-16 20:57:05
Message-ID: CAOYmi+=FSh3_bhO_PAFMy5+NeHm59Re9vgNGrcdUbOO=bZDmbA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 1:31 PM Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> Maybe we should just make it a policy that *nothing* gets moved forward
> from commitfest-to-commitfest and therefore the author needs to care
> enough to register for the next one?

I think that's going to severely disadvantage anyone who doesn't do
this as their day job. Maybe I'm bristling a bit too much at the
wording, but not having time to shepherd a patch is not the same as
not caring.

--Jacob

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Pedersen 2024-05-16 21:00:57 Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Previous Message Andres Freund 2024-05-16 20:54:58 Lowering the minimum value for maintenance_work_mem