| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
| Date: | 2024-04-03 17:55:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+=F2_uN3EFi40seFZqU9oX96HzYZETRjuTBp_PEg8QPow@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 10:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Also, calling Photon 3
> dead because it went EOL three days ago seems over-hasty.
Well, March 1, but either way I thought "dead" for the purposes of
this thread meant "you can't build the very latest version of Postgres
on it", not "we've forgotten it exists". Back branches will continue
to need support and testing.
> Bottom line for me is that pulling 1.0.1 support now is OK,
> but I think pulling 1.0.2 is premature.
Okay, but IIUC, waiting for it to drop out of extended support means
we deal with it for four more years. That seems excessive.
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2024-04-03 17:57:21 | Re: Security lessons from liblzma - libsystemd |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-04-03 17:52:32 | Re: Can't compile PG 17 (master) from git under Msys2 autoconf |