Re: Doubts about replication..

From: Edmundo Robles <edmundo(at)sw-argos(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doubts about replication..
Date: 2018-04-19 18:48:15
Message-ID: CAOXzpYDejJPcivatfQZhx2sSyRGzj-WBCFGJi3xSdUi=1yqBsg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Yes, you are right, the replication is not a backup ;) , actually i
backup database daily at 3:00 am but if database crash, the amount of
data is big! that is the reason i want to replicate to reduce the data
loss. By the way a few days ago a job partner did a delete with no where.

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de
> wrote:

>
>
> Am 19.04.2018 um 19:57 schrieb Edmundo Robles:
>
>> I will use replication as simple backup.
>>
>
> please keep in mind, replication is not a backup. All logical errors on
> the master (delete from table and forgot the where-condition) will
> replicated to the standby.
>
>
> Andreas
>
> --
> 2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
> www.2ndQuadrant.com
>
>
>

--

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PegoraroF10 2018-04-19 18:52:09 Re: Problem with trigger makes Detail record be invalid
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2018-04-19 18:44:20 Re: Problem with trigger makes Detail record be invalid