From: | pasman pasmański <pasman(dot)p(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: problem with compiling beta3 on mingw32+WinXP |
Date: | 2011-07-25 18:56:52 |
Message-ID: | CAOWY8=Z5uQknN3d79MqBu9svDSiv3_F6zZdndwXiu3gycjyZDQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
After googling i found that mingw's gcc works with 64 bit integers.
But printf is incompatible :( . Possible workaround: include
inttypes.h , define macros and convert printf strings:
printf("%" LL,(long long)10000000000)
2011/7/25, pasman pasmański <pasman(dot)p(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hi.
>
> When i try to compile postgresql-beta3 on mingw32 ./configure pass ok,
> but there is error when i do "make":
>
>
> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> -Wendif-labels -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv
> -I../../src/port
> -DFRONTEND -I../../src/include -I./src/include/port/win32 -DEXEC_BACKEND
> "-I../
> ../src/include/port/win32" -c -o crypt.o crypt.c
> In file included from crypt.c:44:0:
> ../../src/include/c.h:284:2: error: #error must have a working 64-bit
> integer da
> tatype
> In file included from ../../src/include/c.h:851:0,
> from crypt.c:44:
> ../../src/include/port.h:390:0: warning: "fseeko" redefined
> ../../src/include/pg_config_os.h:228:0: note: this is the location of the
> previo
> us definition
> ../../src/include/port.h:391:0: warning: "ftello" redefined
> ../../src/include/pg_config_os.h:229:0: note: this is the location of the
> previo
> us definition
> make[2]: *** [crypt.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rosinkr1/postgresql-9.1beta3/src/port'
> make[1]: *** [all-port-recurse] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rosinkr1/postgresql-9.1beta3/src'
> make: *** [all-src-recurse] Error 2
>
> Make version 3.81.
> Status file included.
> What is wrong ?
>
>
> ------------
> pasman
>
--
------------
pasman
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian Pflug | 2011-07-25 19:06:41 | Re: Another issue with invalid XML values |
Previous Message | Alexey Klyukin | 2011-07-25 18:55:09 | Re: proposal: a validator for configuration files |