| From: | Vinicius Santos <vinicius(dot)santos(dot)lista(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: More information about the selected objects |
| Date: | 2012-07-14 14:28:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAOTD_5FSQTmPCOqD1-Vo_pERWOVuzrv+dW828ytLHEv2gianaA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> Not sure I like the point either. We don't have that notation on
> PostgreSQL. I think I would prefer something like "Retrieving details on
> table schema.table" and not say the database. Because if you add the
> database, someone will probably want also the server. It may not be
> usefull to you, but it'll come at some point. And that's quite a lot of
> informations.
>
I agree.
> Probably we could add some status boxes in the status bar. For exemple,
> a box with a "user(at)database (server)" (with a lock icon if you use SSL
> for example. Just a thought.
>
>
I liked the idea!
We could add status boxes in front of the information "Retrieving details
...".
For example, suppose that is the status bar:
With 3 status boxes:
|| "Retrieving details on schema.table" || user(at)database || server ||
or with 2 status boxes:
|| "Retrieving details on schema.table" || user(at)database ( server ) ||
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2012-07-14 16:44:47 | Re: More information about the selected objects |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2012-07-14 14:06:25 | Re: More information about the selected objects |