Re: Is this safe to perform on PostgreSQL 8.3.7 -> Resize a column in a PostgreSQL table without changing data

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Reid Thompson <reid(dot)thompson(at)ateb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is this safe to perform on PostgreSQL 8.3.7 -> Resize a column in a PostgreSQL table without changing data
Date: 2011-11-22 15:21:48
Message-ID: CAOR=d=3uQta00FfWwxRUy2ek3rrm30e9SQMJ0KXrAiCP=ShZ8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Reid Thompson <reid(dot)thompson(at)ateb(dot)com> wrote:
> Note that I man­u­ally added the 4 to the desired size of 35..again, for
> some legacy rea­sons inside PG. Done. That's it. Should we check?
>
> d TABLE1
>
> TABLE "public.TABLE1"
> COLUMN  |  TYPE                 | Modifiers
> --------+-----------------------+-----------
> COL1    | CHARACTER VARYING(35) |
>
> Such a sim­ple yet effec­tive trick. Of course it'd be nicer if this is
> some­how included in a more proper way in the data­base, but this does the
> job.

Note that this method works around all the safe guards etc that make
sure your data is safe and coherent. It works, as long as you're
careful what you're doing.

the real solution, to me, is to stop using varchar limits unless
there's a real reason for them. I.e. arbitrary limits on things like
name lengths make no sense in the db.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message sunpeng 2011-11-22 15:47:15 are there any methods to disable updating index before inserting large number tuples?
Previous Message Reid Thompson 2011-11-22 14:50:05 Is this safe to perform on PostgreSQL 8.3.7 -> Resize a column in a PostgreSQL table without changing data