| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Best <mbest(at)pendragon(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.0 Streaming Replication Problem to two slaves |
| Date: | 2011-08-02 17:55:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAOR=d=3Xe0EGsW6PC9in2R4iC+_T7AP3SdZX60Vj7t7+tFe+jA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Michael Best <mbest(at)pendragon(dot)org> wrote:
> On 07/25/2011 11:38 AM, Michael Best wrote:
>>
>> I have the servers configured, and get the replication up and running,
>> and then it will run for the better part of a day, and then the slaves
>> appear to stop receiving or requesting updates, there doesn't appear to
>> be anything in the logs other than
> Is this likely that the disks are too slow on the replication servers, or is
> something else happening, such as the restoration of logs is considerably
> slower than on the primary?
Could be. Are the drives on the slaves much slower? I'd imagine a
slave with the same drive setup would be able to keep up.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2011-08-02 18:05:47 | Re: 9.0 Streaming Replication Problem to two slaves |
| Previous Message | senthilnathan | 2011-08-02 16:33:27 | Re: Queries Regarding Postgresql Replication |