| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Barnham <andrew(dot)barnham(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL server embedded in NAS firmware? |
| Date: | 2012-09-07 04:05:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAOR=d=2pFm_n8hp0YDNOh_if04Ki+tQnYB94c+7rLQvG_vQP+Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 04:19 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>
>> That shouldn't really matter. Either the db is just on the NAS in
>> which case as long as pg compiles on it then the client on the main
>> unit shouldn't matter, or the data is just stored there and the db is
>> on the main unit, client and all and again it wouldn't matter.
>>
>> But the client and server do NOT have to be the same architecture to
>> work for sure.
>
>
> If I understood the OP, it is not client <--> server, it is:
> main server <--> replication server
>
> In that case architecture would matter.
Ahh I thought he'd be moving both ends of the replication onto embedded nas.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stuart Bishop | 2012-09-07 06:39:45 | Re: pg_dump on hot standby canceled despite hot_standby_feedback=on |
| Previous Message | Edson Richter | 2012-09-07 03:12:39 | Re: Moving several databases into one database with several schemas |