From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org |
Cc: | Kenaniah Cerny <kenaniah(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CentOS initd Script |
Date: | 2012-09-12 16:09:45 |
Message-ID: | CAOR=d=2p+f+A05VjVqKuZJsirbukKEemY-+2s3DPFAAXtpMNxg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, September 12, 2012 6:49 pm, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> Does RH support > 1 cluster of the same version of postgres yet?
>> Looking at the link I can't really tell. Looks like not.
>
> That link exactly tells you how to do that. Running > 1 9.2 clusters in
> parallel.
Sorry wasn't clear. I meant does RH support running > 1 cluster of
the same version with simple commands from the command line. Like
pg_createcluster does. Of course you can run > 1 cluster if you're
willing to copy init scripts and jump through hoops, but RH is still
years behind debian on the "running > 1 postgres" front at this point.
And if you're a beginning DBA / Sysadmin it's one less thing to have
to hassle with, which is why I recommend debian for newer pg dbas who
need to build their own machines. For me personally it's no big deal
but I'm not always the guy on call either.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2012-09-12 16:18:53 | Re: CentOS initd Script |
Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2012-09-12 15:59:52 | Re: CentOS initd Script |