Re: Performance of a Query

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Kumar, Virendra" <Virendra(dot)Kumar(at)guycarp(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance of a Query
Date: 2018-01-09 23:25:58
Message-ID: CAOR=d=1sArN+gw6AUZa9Znz13Hcz_kW4UuyMRG9nMcNzNvfXbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Kumar, Virendra
<Virendra(dot)Kumar(at)guycarp(dot)com> wrote:
> It did not seem to help.
> See attachment.

Yeah while it's still writing, it's about half as much but most of the
time seems to be in merging etc multiple data sets. I'm wondering
what non-default values you might have set otherwise. Are you running
on SSDs? If so lowering random_page_cost might help, but again, this
might just be a very expensive query as well.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-01-10 01:24:10 Re: Need Help on wal_compression
Previous Message Kumar, Virendra 2018-01-09 23:09:13 RE: Performance of a Query