From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org |
Cc: | Kenaniah Cerny <kenaniah(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CentOS initd Script |
Date: | 2012-09-12 15:49:22 |
Message-ID: | CAOR=d=1q=F_eob-7HYBp_FL0Nn9m7mHVU88Nsgu35VARy=eWPw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, September 12, 2012 5:54 pm, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> While RHEL is a solid and reliable OS, it was never built to run > 1
>> version etc of pgsql easily.
>
> I would disagree with this. All you need is this:
>
> http://svn.pgrpms.org/browser/rpm/redhat/9.2/postgresql/EL-6/README.rpm-dist#L187
or one command in debian, which has been there for years and years
(since etch at least):
pg_createcluster 9.1 mynewcluster
I stand by my opinion here. While it's nice that RH is finally
getting around to implementing something like this, I've been using it
for a long time in production in debian and debian based distros for
years with little or no issues. Does RH support > 1 cluster of the
same version of postgres yet? Looking at the link I can't really
tell. Looks like not.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2012-09-12 15:57:17 | Re: RPM contents for 9.2 community release. |
Previous Message | Jeremy Whiting | 2012-09-12 15:23:17 | RPM contents for 9.2 community release. |