From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Rees <drees76(at)gmail(dot)com>, bret_stern(at)machinemanagement(dot)com, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SSD Drives |
Date: | 2014-04-03 22:19:45 |
Message-ID: | CAOR=d=1mA9Tw25At0bKwpTJ7ZkL=miVSQWczVtS8Cq9RXU8_Xg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On a machine with 16 cores with HT (appears as 32 cores) and 8 of the
>> 3700 series Intel SSDs in a RAID-10 under an LSI MegaRAID with BBU, I
>> was able to get 6300 to 7500 tps on a decent sized pgbench db
>> (-s1000).
>
> Did you happen to grab any 'select only' numbers?
Darnit. Nope. I'll try to grab some on a spare box if I get one again.
Now they're all in production so running pgbench is kind of frowned
upon.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2014-04-03 22:22:08 | Re: SSD Drives |
Previous Message | Matthew Chambers | 2014-04-03 21:48:25 | Re: Spring JDBC and the PostgreSQL JDBC driver |