Re: 3 disks configured RAID 0 over 10 disks configured in RAID 5 (self replicating SAN)

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rene Romero Benavides <rene(dot)romero(dot)b(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 3 disks configured RAID 0 over 10 disks configured in RAID 5 (self replicating SAN)
Date: 2013-08-28 00:47:27
Message-ID: CAOR=d=1c6vzarbPO_CJx3KrYChz5bJduexpsUZurhEkkLmhuCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Does your controller support odd number RAID-10 i.e. RAID 1E? If so
then 3 disks in RAID-1E. Or better 10 disks in 1E

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Rene Romero Benavides
<rene(dot)romero(dot)b(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for your attention.
> What would you choose for a postgresql installation: 3 disks configured with
> RAID 0 (in a self replicating SAN) over 10 disks configured with RAID 5
> (also in a self replicating SAN) , we have space constraints that prohibit
> us from choosing RAID 1+0.
> I've been persuaded to choose RAID 5, because writes and parity computation
> will be spread over 10 disks compensating write overhead providing a better
> level of data security.
>
> Do you think it was a good decision? Any comment will be appreciated. Have a
> good day.
>
> --
> El genio es 1% inspiración y 99% transpiración.
> Thomas Alva Edison
> http://pglearn.blogspot.mx/
>

--
To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rene Romero Benavides 2013-08-28 01:18:42 Re: 3 disks configured RAID 0 over 10 disks configured in RAID 5 (self replicating SAN)
Previous Message Scott Whitney 2013-08-27 23:18:28 Re: 3 disks configured RAID 0 over 10 disks configured in RAID 5 (self replicating SAN)