Re: Question about VACUUM

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ernesto Quiñones <ernestoq(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question about VACUUM
Date: 2011-12-03 20:05:04
Message-ID: CAOR=d=1A2=D2AyfOu1k7gAZ2pG5V7pMA3WZBM8uYadWbkv9OAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Ernesto Quiñones <ernestoq(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the answer Scott, actually my  autovacuum_naptime is 1h ..
> but I don't find naptime parameter for a manual vacuum

That's really high, but what I meant to as was what your
vacuum_cost_delay was set to. Also vacuum_cost_limit.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-12-03 23:42:27 Re: pg_upgrade
Previous Message Tory M Blue 2011-12-03 19:35:22 Re: pg_upgrade