Re: WAL Shipping and streaming replication

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: CS DBA <cs_dba(at)consistentstate(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL Shipping and streaming replication
Date: 2015-09-28 14:54:54
Message-ID: CAOR=d=14eCPYkthiDhc5vN5yNdifKG6PeyQnV0Nr33LdtNyG5A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:48 AM, CS DBA <cs_dba(at)consistentstate(dot)com> wrote:
> All;
>
> We have a 3 node replication setup:
>
> Master (node1) --> Cascading Replication Node (node2) --> Downstream
> Standby node (node3)
>
> We will be deploying WAL archiving from the master for PITR backups and
> we'll use the staged WAL files in the recovery.conf files in case the
> standbys need to revert to log shipping.
>
> Question: whats the best way to ensure consistency of WAL archiving in the
> case of changes (failover, etc)? can we setup the cascade node to archive
> wals only if it's the master? is this a case where we should deploy repmgr?

Look up WAL-E. It's works really well. We tried using OmniPITR and
it's buggy and doesn't seem to get fixed very quickly (if at all).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keith Fiske 2015-09-28 15:12:49 Re: WAL Shipping and streaming replication
Previous Message CS DBA 2015-09-28 14:48:59 WAL Shipping and streaming replication