From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andy Yoder <ayoder(at)airfacts(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: "Too far out of the mainstream" |
Date: | 2012-09-01 15:27:58 |
Message-ID: | CAOR=d=0ervgFyggOhNpyYrmjBW+_0LW3AjPPLV1jYrnO7pR0jA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> 1) While MySQL is perhaps better marketed, PostgreSQL is an older project
>>> with a proud heritage (Informix started as a Postgres fork), and top-rate
>
>> Pretty sure that's not true. Ingres is a cousin of Postgres started
>> by the same guy, Stonebraker, but it's not a fork either.
>
> He didn't say Ingres.
Yeah I thought he might have been conflating the two.
> Illustra was a commercial fork of Postgres (the pre-SQL versions, I
> think). It was later bought out by Informix. I don't have any info
> on how much of that code base survives in the modern (IBM-owned)
> version of Informix - but one could assume there's at least some.
Possibly, but it hardly makes informix a fork of postgres.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-09-01 15:33:17 | Re: "Too far out of the mainstream" |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-01 15:01:32 | Re: "Too far out of the mainstream" |