From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "SUNDAY A(dot) OLUTAYO" <olutayo(at)sadeeb(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Chris Ernst <cernst(at)zvelo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Linux Distribution Preferences? |
Date: | 2013-01-16 00:21:38 |
Message-ID: | CAOR=d=0aF-DWuYy2Cmo8eXZSSdO0Le=OaqHgecGDKFy=1RiaAw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 08:46:58PM -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> The reasons to NOT use ubuntu under PostgreSQL are primarily that 1:
>> they often choose a pretty meh grade kernel with performance
>> regressions for their initial LTS release. I.e. they'll choose a
>> 3.4.0 kernel over a very stable 3.2.latest kernel, and then patch away
>> til the LTS becomes stable. This is especially problematic the first
>> 6 to 12 months after an LTS release.
>
> This really sums it up for me. Do you need the most recent kernel with
> all the performance enhancements and new hardware support, and if so,
> are you willing to accept frequent updates and breakage as the bugs are
> fixed?
Yeah. If you just started development and expect to deploy in 6 to 12
months time it's pretty acceptable. If the distro's been out a year
it's ok. If you already have a solid and reliable infrastructure,
then you should be doing a LOT of stress testing before using a new
distro.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Meta Seller Dev/Admin | 2013-01-16 00:22:30 | SELECT * and column ordering |
Previous Message | Ken Tanzer | 2013-01-16 00:09:52 | Re: Getting Mysql data into Postgres: least painful methods? |