Re: Two Necessary Kernel Tweaks for Linux Systems

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com
Cc: Midge Brown <midgems(at)sbcglobal(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two Necessary Kernel Tweaks for Linux Systems
Date: 2013-01-08 19:04:36
Message-ID: CAOR=d=0R1GPVfhhy9w2+j=czNvgtbA519rY6-Or6sNegvQmdFQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com> wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 12:31 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> What's the comparison of these settings versus say going to the NOP
>> scheduler?
>
>
> Assuming you actually meant NOP and not the NOOP I/O scheduler, I don't
> know. These CPU scheduler tweaks are all I could dig up, and googling for
> NOP by itself or combined with Linux terms is tremendously unhelpful.

Assembly language on the brain. of course I meant NOOP.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shaun Thomas 2013-01-08 19:32:14 Re: Two Necessary Kernel Tweaks for Linux Systems
Previous Message Shaun Thomas 2013-01-08 18:36:50 Re: Two Necessary Kernel Tweaks for Linux Systems