| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Success stories of PostgreSQL implementations in different companies |
| Date: | 2013-05-24 14:34:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAOR=d=0BQ2arOtn8GDDEpDKxKevkszST=vv8m1sESsw4m++dhQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Also it's worth noting that there are no reporting / licensing
requirements for postgresql. It's all over the place, and you just
don't see it. My last company we had a 400G user database serving some
2million students daily, and were seriously pounding a pair of $25k db
servers to handle the load. And that was with memcache to remove a lot
of the read only load as well. We're talking 500 to 700Mb/s outbound
traffic, sustained, for about 9 months out of the year. For every
story you see of someone using pgsql, there are literally thousands of
users you never hear of.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oscar Calderon | 2013-05-24 14:39:06 | Re: Success stories of PostgreSQL implementations in different companies |
| Previous Message | Chris Angelico | 2013-05-24 14:27:48 | Re: Success stories of PostgreSQL implementations in different companies |