Re: Postgres performance issue

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Junaid Malik <junaid(dot)malik(at)confiz(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres performance issue
Date: 2017-05-04 14:36:30
Message-ID: CAOR=d=08+WL-kkXv1MdBq7m9pPMSzBWfEJ0tAY8gwMFydD7PAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Junaid Malik <junaid(dot)malik(at)confiz(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> We are facing problem related to performance of Postgres. Indexes are not
> being utilized and Postgres is giving priority to seq scan. I read many
> articles of Postgres performance and found that we need to set the
> randome_page_cost value same as seq_page_cost because we are using SSD
> drives. We are running copy of Discourse forum, you can read more about
> Discourse here meta.discourse.org. Details of all Server hardware and
> Postgres version are given below.
>
> I am adding my Postgres configuration file in attachment, kindly review it
> and suggest the changes so that i can improve the performance of whole
> system. Currently queries are taking lot of time. I can also share the
> schema with you and queries in detail too.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Postgres Version : 9.5.4
>
> Server Hardware details :
> Dedicate machine
> 16 Physical cores 32 Logical cores
> RAM : 64 GB
> RAM Type : DDR3
> Drive Type : SSD
> Raid Controller : MegaRAID SAS 2108 Raid Card
> Configured Raids : 10
> No of Drives : 4
> File System : XFS

Please read this page
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Guide_to_reporting_problems

--
To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2017-05-04 14:57:03 Re: Postgres performance issue
Previous Message Junaid Malik 2017-05-04 14:10:01 Postgres performance issue