Re: [report] memory leaks in COPY FROM on partitioned table

From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)heterodb(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [report] memory leaks in COPY FROM on partitioned table
Date: 2018-08-03 02:26:56
Message-ID: CAOP8fzb_NMnsXj4RS9ji+CQF7-9wOrSvrG5Bbrpejjsw_tW3Bw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2018-08-02 5:38 GMT+09:00 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 2018-Aug-01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> Right, makes sense. Pushed that way.
>
> KaiGai, if you can please confirm that the pushed change fixes your test
> case, I'd appreciate it.
>
Can you wait for a few days? I can drop the test dataset and reuse the storage
once benchmark test is over....
--
HeteroDB, Inc / The PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)heterodb(dot)com>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2018-08-03 02:35:50 Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-08-03 01:57:02 Re: Ideas for a relcache test mode about missing invalidations