| From: | "Strauch, Sheldon" <sstrauch(at)enova(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Steve Erickson <serickson(at)digitiliti(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgAdmin Support <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgtune |
| Date: | 2014-01-16 16:52:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAONmzmVOHsQKFLfNgSYF94b1wdVsmC0T8TkjEj_T-xKrewgKww@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-support |
pgTune is a nice utility for tuning Postgres running on an 80386 with 12 MB
of memory.
Seriously, it is dated and will produce erroneous indications for
remediation. If one follows those indications blindly, particularly given
our large-memory servers, the results will likely be catastrophically bad.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Steve Erickson <serickson(at)digitiliti(dot)com>wrote:
> Has anybody used pgtune? How reliable are the results? Are they a good
> baseline to work from?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
--
If we always do what we've always done,
we'll continue to get what we've always gotten.
Sheldon E. Strauch
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Erickson | 2014-01-16 17:04:36 | Re: pgtune |
| Previous Message | bithead | 2014-01-16 16:43:11 | Re: wxWidgets Debug Alert assert "sizeNew == -1" |