Re: pgpool versus which tool?

From: Prince Pathria <prince(dot)pathria(at)goevive(dot)com>
To: spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgpool versus which tool?
Date: 2018-10-15 10:00:44
Message-ID: CAON0DazNfUSGJ5d2fHbPK1bOEJPx=kGmcn3CF0+L9o0a8ZE31Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hey Pierre,

go for pgBouncer if you want transaction based pooling and if your sole aim
to use pgPool is for pooling then better go for pgBouncer.
pgBouncer performs 3x better than pgpool-II in benchmarking results.

Thanks!

Prince Pathria
Systems Architect Evive +91 9478670472 goevive.com

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> Pierre Ochsenbein schrieb am 15.10.2018 um 09:38:
> > Which best of tool you recommend to replace pgpool?
> What's wrong with pgPool that you think you need to replace it?
>
> And what is you requirement for such a tool?
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pavan95 2018-10-15 10:11:03 Re: Hick ups in Postgresql Logical Replication
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2018-10-15 08:21:40 Re: pgpool versus which tool?