| From: | Bradford Boyle <bradford(dot)d(dot)boyle(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-pkg-debian(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Updated packaging for MobilityDB 1.1.0~beta1 |
| Date: | 2023-11-08 07:19:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAOMoQbSx15rmheFUXH+8=ddXcpbFKhEFUfu7jd2=hbvaW1v6BQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-debian |
Hi Christoph,
> I've done that now, it will be available in postgresql-common 256.
Thank you!
> pg_buildext run_installed /usr/bin/cmake -Btest-%v
> pg_buildext run_installed make -C test-% test
>
> ... but that starts by recompiling the package instead of just running
> the tests.
>
> Perhaps you have an idea how to make it work? The existing
> debian/tests/regress.sh file looks very complex and might break with
> every little upstream change. (Of course if there's no easier way to
> get the upstream testsuite to run, we have to go the complex route.)
I agree with your assessment of d/tests/regress.sh. The reason I went
that route initially was because running cmake followed by make test was
rebuilding the package. I did see that autopkgtest has the
'build-needed' restriction [1] but its use seems to be discouraged. I
took another look at the upstream testsuite to see if we can (easily)
run its testsuite without require a rebuild and I think I have found a
way.
In short, upstream was defining a test called 'build' that would rebuild
the extension. We can instruct ctest to exclude this test by specifying
a regex. I was able to drop regress.sh altogether and have
d/tests/installcheck run
cmake -Btest-%v
make -C test-%v ARGS='-E build' test
This does require repeating the list of -dev packages in d/tests/control
so that cmake can generate the Makefiles. If this sounds like a good
approach to you, I can push the commit to s.d.o.
--Bradford
[1]: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-tests.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2023-11-08 08:13:45 | Re: Updated packaging for MobilityDB 1.1.0~beta1 |
| Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2023-11-06 16:25:42 | Re: Updated packaging for MobilityDB 1.1.0~beta1 |