Re: A Small psql Suggestion

From: Matt Zagrabelny <mzagrabe(at)d(dot)umn(dot)edu>
To: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A Small psql Suggestion
Date: 2023-02-01 15:25:25
Message-ID: CAOLfK3Uf40ehCwBXnGu4_dq3xX+9aHRRtxDEYhbe7_r6zMOM9w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At the risk of starting a +1 snowball or a divergent argument...

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:16 AM Raymond Brinzer <ray(dot)brinzer(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> There is (for me) a small speed bump in psql. I think it's worth
> mentioning, minor though it is, because psql is such a polished tool
> generally, and because it's something which affects me many, many times a
> day.
>
> As it is, \d is a shortcut for \dtmvs. What I actually want to see, on a
> regular basis, are my relations: \dtmv. Most of the time, the sequences
> are clutter. If my habits are like most people's in this (and I suspect
> they are), excluding sequences from \d would optimize for the common case.
>

+1

Of course, I don't generally have that many relations that the few
sequences that show up are cause for issue, but it would be nice to not
have to parse them visually.

-m

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc Millas 2023-02-01 15:39:49 Re: Best Open Source OS for Postgresql
Previous Message Wim Bertels 2023-02-01 15:21:05 Re: Best Open Source OS for Postgresql