From: | Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel query execution with SPI |
Date: | 2017-03-31 11:06:23 |
Message-ID: | CAOGQiiPV_aiCRoqbNGU21d-QE4rtJghfFb2Zw_452Zu1Z8FPyA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik
> <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> It is possible to execute query concurrently using SPI?
>> If so, how it can be enforced?
>> I tried to open cursor with CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK flag but it doesn't help:
>> query is executed by single backend while the same query been launched at
>> top level uses parallel plan:
>>
>> fsstate->portal = SPI_cursor_open_with_args(NULL, fsstate->query,
>> fsstate->numParams, argtypes, values, nulls, true, CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK);
>> ...
>> SPI_cursor_fetch(fsstate->portal, true, 1);
>
> Parallel execution isn't possible if you are using a cursor-type
> interface, because a parallel query can't be suspended and resumed
> like a non-parallel query. If you use a function that executes the
> query to completion in one go, like SPI_execute_plan, then it's cool.
> See also commit 61c2e1a95f94bb904953a6281ce17a18ac38ee6d.
>
> --
Adding to that, for your case, passing CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK is not
enough, because PortalRun for the cursor would be having
portal->run_once set as false which restricts parallelism in
ExecutePlan,
if (!execute_once || dest->mydest == DestIntoRel)
use_parallel_mode = false;
You may check [1] for the discussion on this.
--
Regards,
Rafia Sabih
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-03-31 11:43:36 | Re: TPC-H Q20 from 1 hour to 19 hours! |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-03-31 11:03:28 | Re: Supporting huge pages on Windows |