Re: utility commands benefiting from parallel plan

From: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: utility commands benefiting from parallel plan
Date: 2017-09-13 06:17:14
Message-ID: CAOGQiiPApfyX_U6U9muctxGF9Br5rgMgvm4ESGa8+oRnpFT08g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Attached a rebased patch that supports parallelism for the queries
> that are underneath of some utility commands such as CREATE TABLE AS
> and CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW.
>
> Note: This patch doesn't make the utility statement (insert operation)
> to run in parallel. It only allows the select query to be parallel if the
> query
> is eligible for parallel.
>

Here is my feedback fro this patch,

- The patch is working as expected, all regression tests are passing
- I agree with Dilip that having similar mechanism for 'insert into
select...' statements would add more value to the patch, but even then
this looks like a good idea to extend parallelism for atleast a few of
the write operations

--
Regards,
Rafia Sabih
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Chalke 2017-09-13 06:47:58 Re: Constraint exclusion for partitioned tables
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-09-13 06:01:56 Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq