From: | Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel Index-only scan |
Date: | 2016-12-28 06:48:48 |
Message-ID: | CAOGQiiOv9NA1VrAo8PmENfGi-y=Cj_DiTF4vyjp+fmuEzovwEA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Rebased patch of parallel-index only scan based on the latest version of
parallel index scan [1] is attached.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1LiNi7_Z1%
2BPCV4y06o_v%3DZdZ1UThE%2BW9JhthX4B8uifnA%40mail.gmail.com
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:
> Extremely sorry for the inconvenience caused, please find the attached
> file for the latest version of the patch.
>
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Or in words of one syllable: please do not use nabble to post to the
>> > community mailing lists.
>>
>> Many of those words have two syllables, and one has four.
>>
>> Anyhow, I think three castigating emails from committers in a span of
>> 62 minutes is probably enough for the OP to get the point, unless
>> someone else REALLY feels the need to pile on.
>>
>> --
>> Robert Haas
>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rafia Sabih
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com/
>
--
Regards,
Rafia Sabih
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
parallel_index_only_v3.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2016-12-28 06:54:01 | Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2016-12-28 06:38:31 | Re: ALTER TABLE parent SET WITHOUT OIDS and the oid column |