| From: | Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tushar Ahuja <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: increasing the default WAL segment size |
| Date: | 2017-03-31 05:52:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAOG9ApEiUvCYSnPEonrJDbapdygDL+=od42KwVMGGZueks7E7A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On 30 Mar 2017 15:10, "Kuntal Ghosh" <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I do not think a generalised function is a good idea. Besides, I feel the
> > respective approaches are best kept in the modules used also because the
> > internal code is not easily accessible by utils.
> >
> Ahh, I wonder what the reason can be. Anyway, I'll leave that decision
> for the committer. I'm moving the status to Ready for committer.
>
>
Thank you.
--
Beena Emerson
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arthur Zakirov | 2017-03-31 05:58:50 | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
| Previous Message | Kuntal Ghosh | 2017-03-31 05:50:32 | Re: increasing the default WAL segment size |