| From: | Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
| Date: | 2018-04-04 04:48:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAOG9ApEKwPbDNDdfjq0POFozVhDiqav4Vc8YYfApWCBA83OHRQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi David,
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 7:57 AM, David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4 April 2018 at 05:50, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> With Amit's v46 patch, the following query in partition_prune was
>> crashing during make check.
>> explain (analyze, costs off, summary off, timing off) execute ab_q1 (2, 2, 3);
>
> Hi Beena,
>
> Thanks for looking.
>
> Does it work correctly if you apply [1] to Amit's v46 patch before
> patching with v18 run-time partition pruning?
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKJS1f_6%2BgXB%3DQ%2BDryeB62yW7N19sY8hH_dBSjPFjm2ifdgoCw%40mail.gmail.com
>
Thanks for working on it. make check passes when the patch [1] is also applied.
--
Beena Emerson
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-04-04 05:29:28 | Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-04-04 04:03:31 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |