From: | Ninad Shah <nshah(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Lucas <root(at)sud0(dot)nz>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 high replication lag |
Date: | 2021-07-23 16:47:03 |
Message-ID: | CAOFEiBdttmeyPznfXWOvKe40gy9X2n2DzWbWe9M-vAt4FBfZyw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Version 9.2 is very old and has a lot of issues related to streaming
replication. Additionally, it is already EOL.
Furthermore, max_standby_streaming_delay has no relation with the streaming
lag. It's associated with queries conflicting with data. This parameter
will not speed up the WAL apply operation.
Kindly consider upgrading to a supported version.
Regards,
Ninad Shah
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 15:18, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:38 AM Lucas <root(at)sud0(dot)nz> wrote:
> > However, it hasn't changed and the replication lag is still high all the
> time.
> >
>
> Since the documentation states that max_standby_streaming_delay
> "[...]it is the maximum total time allowed to apply WAL data once it
> has been received from the primary server[...]", could it be the
> trivial explaination that the master is serving WALs with an high
> delay?
>
> Luca
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bryn Llewellyn | 2021-07-23 17:55:11 | Re: Have I found an interval arithmetic bug? |
Previous Message | Mayan | 2021-07-23 15:22:39 | pg_restore (fromuser -> touser) |