Re: Diagnosing a massive toast file

From: Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Diagnosing a massive toast file
Date: 2019-08-05 17:00:58
Message-ID: CAOC+FBWsvJJawBNBdan1n2pbQYWdZLvCF=2nUZq2hK0OHryXfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Appreciate it, guys. I understand it being large isn't itself a problem,
but relative to history and the lack of real changes, it's just strange and
I'd like to better understand what is going on...

I tracked it down to a specific table, and then doing a VACUUM FULL ANALYZE
on that table yields: 108765 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.

Which strikes me as odd. Any reading I can do to better understand why so
many (relative to the overall table size) dead rows cannot be removed?

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:49 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Yeah, trying to figure out what actual table is clearly in need of a
> vacuum
> > b/c of the size of that toast table.
>
> Something like
>
> select relname from pg_class
> where reltoastrelid = 'pg_toast.pg_toast_NNN'::regclass;
>
> (or, if you have potential duplicate relnames, select oid::regclass ...)
>
> The mere fact that it's big does not indicate a problem, though.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Wells Oliver
wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com <wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wells Oliver 2019-08-05 17:03:02 Re: Diagnosing a massive toast file
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-08-05 16:49:01 Re: Diagnosing a massive toast file