From: | Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: nextval() on serial using old, existing value on insert? |
Date: | 2023-05-11 05:02:51 |
Message-ID: | CAOC+FBWNpEvA9mSj3_wfhc2PPpeEr5BBshaN4trbXvgPgep0wQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Ah, I think that must be it-- there are 200 some rows where manually
supplied values for that common_key column are higher than the nextval() on
the serial. So eventually they might be "re-used".
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 9:55 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, May 10, 2023, Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I have a simple table with a given column defined like so:
>>
>> common_key | integer | | not null |
>> nextval('alias.identity_common_key_seq'::regclass) | plain
>>
>> Very very very infrequently, on an INSERT where this column is not
>> specified, this column will be assigned a value that already exists in the
>> table, versus the next presumably unused value in the sequence. I cannot
>> figure this out. Is there any reason why this might be the case?
>>
>
> Most likely someone inserted data without using the sequence and
> eventually the sequence catches up with that previously inserted data.
>
> David J.
>
>
--
Wells Oliver
wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com <wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wells Oliver | 2023-05-11 05:06:28 | Re: nextval() on serial using old, existing value on insert? |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-05-11 04:55:12 | Re: nextval() on serial using old, existing value on insert? |