From: | Wells Oliver <wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jerry Levan <jerry(dot)levan(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Yosemite (OSX 10.0) problems with Postgresql |
Date: | 2014-10-20 16:36:05 |
Message-ID: | CAOC+FBVU9WtJVrFczUh81Lo-Ja-b3zwK4aGVsMC+9RUwOsCS=Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Not to derail, but I've found this distribution of PG on OSX to be
fantastic:
It includes all the proper launch files that work with Yosemite.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 08:26 PM, Jerry Levan wrote:
> > I just upgraded one of my Mac computers to Yosemite and am having a
> > small problem.
>
> Are you talking about the PostgreSQL built-in to OS X?
>
> The PostgreSQL Development Group (PGDG) doesn't control Apple's
> packaging of PostgreSQL at all. Unfortunately.
>
> It is my understanding that Apple install PostgreSQL for Apple's
> internal use in their products, like OS X Server, Server.app, etc.
>
> Apple have finally taken PostgreSQL off the default PATH in their new OS
> X release, but it looks like they've done it pretty brutally, pretty
> much just converting the databases their products use and discarding the
> others.
>
> I don't have a Mac, (and frustratingly, Apple still don't offer VMs for
> developer use), so I can't really test or investigate details.
>
> If you're talking about the version of PostgreSQL bundled in OS X, then
> I suggest contacting Apple support. Angrily.
>
> Mac-using hackers, anyone know more? I've seen a few reports of people
> losing data on Stack Overflow and apple.stackexchange.com and I'm quite
> concerned about this.
>
> > 1) The upgrade evidently *deletes* directories pg_tblspc, pg_twophase,
> and pg_stat_tmp from
> > the postgresql data directory. Google said to recreate the missing
> directories and indeed
> > Postgresql then was able to start.
>
> That's a truly insane thing for an updater to do for any reason. Why
> would it do that?
>
> --
> Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
--
Wells Oliver
wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-10-20 16:40:43 | Re: Yosemite (OSX 10.0) problems with Postgresql |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-10-20 16:32:57 | Re: Yosemite (OSX 10.0) problems with Postgresql |