Re: [pgAdmin][RM-6143]: Shared server entries not getting deleted.

From: Nikhil Mohite <nikhil(dot)mohite(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin][RM-6143]: Shared server entries not getting deleted.
Date: 2021-02-22 07:21:30
Message-ID: CAOBg0ANTT=SeeG8yMaVUK_5UcO3fCGAae5KdzXAKL2GP3_kGeg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi Akshay/ Team,

Please find an attached updated patch for RM-6143, Added missing updated
shared server owner name in the *"sharedserver"* table while the user
changing the ownership of the shared server.

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:34 AM Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:

> Thanks, patch applied.
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:22 PM Nikhil Mohite <
> nikhil(dot)mohite(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> Please find the updated patch for RM-6143.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nikhil Mohite.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 2:52 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 7:51 AM Nikhil Mohite <
>>> nikhil(dot)mohite(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dave/ Team,
>>>>
>>>> As per the suggestions I have created a sample UI for change ownership
>>>> of shared servers before deleting the user(only for admin user).
>>>> [image: shared_server_change_ownsership.png]
>>>> The user list will contain all admin users. (This alert will get
>>>> display if the admin user has created any shared servers.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> The UI is fine, but the wording needs work. A couple of general hints:
>>> An entire sense would never be in parentheses, and there should always be a
>>> space following a full stop.
>>>
>>> "Select the user that will take ownership of the shared servers created
>>> by <user name>. <num servers> shared servers are currently owned by this
>>> user."
>>>
>>> "Note: If no user is selected, the shared servers will be deleted."
>>>
>>> I'd also suggest that if the user does not select a new owner, a message
>>> box should ask for confirmation before continuing:
>>>
>>> "The shared servers owned by <user name> will be deleted. Do you wish to
>>> continue?".
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions or if I missed anything please let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Nikhil Mohite
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:07 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:33 AM Nikhil Mohite <
>>>>> nikhil(dot)mohite(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 3:24 PM Akshay Joshi <
>>>>>> akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reverted the commit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 3:13 PM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This seems like a very bad idea. What if the user that has left was
>>>>>>>> the user that setup 50 connections used by everyone else?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Deleting those shared entries is (I would guess) most likely *not*
>>>>>>>> what the majority of users would want, and the current behaviour is
>>>>>>>> definitely safest.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the current implementation when the admin user gets deleted all "*Server
>>>>>> groups*" created by that user are getting deleted, so if that admin
>>>>>> has created any *Shared server* other users are not able to access
>>>>>> it as its server group is not present in the database.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That seems bad. I would suggest we only delete the group if there are
>>>>> no shared servers left in it that would become orphaned. Of course, in that
>>>>> case we'll also need to reassign ownership of the group.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We should make this optional; i.e. ask the use if they want shared
>>>>>>>> servers created by the user to be deleted. If they say no, they should be
>>>>>>>> reassigned to another user; either the admin that's deleting the user, or
>>>>>>>> their choice of user (a little more complex of course, but more flexible).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the shared server table, we are creating entries per user, for
>>>>>> deletion of non-admin user we can delete the shared server tables entries
>>>>>> as it will not affect any other users. (because only admin users can mark
>>>>>> the server as shared.)
>>>>>> In case of admin user deletion, will add an extra check as suggested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds good - thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please revert this, until the deletion is made optional.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 9:23 AM Akshay Joshi <
>>>>>>>> akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks, patch applied.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:18 PM Nikhil Mohite <
>>>>>>>>> nikhil(dot)mohite(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Team,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please find the attached patch for RM-6143
>>>>>>>>>> <https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/6143>: Shared server
>>>>>>>>>> entries not getting deleted.
>>>>>>>>>> Added code to delete shared server entries if the admin deletes
>>>>>>>>>> the user from user management.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks & Regards,*
>>>>>>>>>> *Nikhil Mohite*
>>>>>>>>>> *Software Engineer.*
>>>>>>>>>> *EDB Postgres* <https://www.enterprisedb.com/>
>>>>>>>>>> *Mob.No: +91-7798364578.*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> *Thanks & Regards*
>>>>>>>>> *Akshay Joshi*
>>>>>>>>> *pgAdmin Hacker | Principal Software Architect*
>>>>>>>>> *EDB Postgres <http://edbpostgres.com>*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Thanks & Regards*
>>>>>>> *Akshay Joshi*
>>>>>>> *pgAdmin Hacker | Principal Software Architect*
>>>>>>> *EDB Postgres <http://edbpostgres.com>*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Nikhil Mohite.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>
>>>>> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Page
>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>
>>> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> *Thanks & Regards*
> *Akshay Joshi*
> *pgAdmin Hacker | Principal Software Architect*
> *EDB Postgres <http://edbpostgres.com>*
>
> *Mobile: +91 976-788-8246*
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
RM_6143_v3.patch application/octet-stream 1.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aditya Toshniwal 2021-02-22 09:21:37 [pgAdmin][patch] ERD API test case failing for PG13
Previous Message Akshay Joshi 2021-02-22 05:44:29 Re: [pgAdmin][RM6201]:SSL Support in subscription.