| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup fails on databases with high OIDs |
| Date: | 2020-01-06 08:31:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAOBaU_bNB5_-6XHdebsPrrX29v-=WqMMaiPnNsjQmpjvw+QH3g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 9:21 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:07:26AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > This is a new bug in PG12. When you have a database with an OID above
> > INT32_MAX (signed), then pg_basebackup fails thus:
>
> Yep. Introduced by 6b9e875.
Indeed.
> > pg_basebackup: error: could not get write-ahead log end position from
> > server: ERROR: value "3000000000" is out of range for type integer
> >
> > The cause appears to be commit 6b9e875f7286d8535bff7955e5aa3602e188e436.
> >
> > A possible fix is attached. An alternative to using OidInputFunctionCall()
> > would be exporting something like oidin_subr().
>
> I think that you would save yourself from a lot of trouble if you do
> the latter with a subroutine. Not quite like that based on the
> process context where the call is done, but remember 21f428eb..
+0.5 to avoid calling OidInputFunctionCall()
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2020-01-06 08:41:28 | Re: adding partitioned tables to publications |
| Previous Message | Surafel Temesgen | 2020-01-06 08:20:56 | Re: A rather hackish POC for alternative implementation of WITH TIES |