| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: vacuumdb and new VACUUM options |
| Date: | 2019-05-08 09:37:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAOBaU_bJw1pwrPD7jvB-4CeDSyo7tt9eWOMjo1c5LSVLj2oYXg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:06 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:26:35AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > I think it's a good idea to add new options of these parameters for
> > vacuumdb. While making INDEX_CLEANUP option patch I also attached the
> > patch for INDEX_CLEANUP parameter before[1], although it adds
> > --disable-index-cleanup option instead.
>
> I have added an open item for that. I think that we should added
> these options.
+1, and thanks for adding the open item!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-05-08 10:10:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2019-05-08 08:09:03 | Re: Regression test PANICs with master-standby setup on same machine |