From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback as a reliable metric for xid consumption ? |
Date: | 2020-06-01 11:03:33 |
Message-ID: | CAOBaU_b3BG2jicgv7Woyo8vT1V3dnw4xPvMR=AuZ6hMWYuPjKQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:48 PM Achilleas Mantzios
<achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 1/6/20 1:36 μ.μ., Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:02 PM Achilleas Mantzios
> > <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:
> > Because read only transaction usually don't consume an xid. So yes
> > pg_stat_database gives a more reasonable approximation of the real
> > number of transactions happening on the server.
> Thank you, so what would be the official way to monitor txid consumption (from a MVCC / Freezing admin POV)?
I'm not sure what you're really looking for. If it's the txid
consumption rate, you can use txid_current() at regular interval to
compute it (note that this function will consume a txid). For object
freeeze, you can use age(datfrozenxid) from pg_database, or
age(relfrozenxid) from pg_class.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Achilleas Mantzios | 2020-06-01 12:40:51 | Re: pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback as a reliable metric for xid consumption ? |
Previous Message | Achilleas Mantzios | 2020-06-01 10:48:33 | Re: pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback as a reliable metric for xid consumption ? |